QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF TWO QUALITATIVE SCALES USED TO RATE MILITARY INTELLIGENCESAMET MG.1975; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 192-202; BIBL. 12REFArticle

DEVELOPING GUIDELINES FOR SUMMARIZING INFORMATIONSAMET MG; GEISELMAN RE.1981; HUM. FACTORS; ISSN 0018-7208; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 23; NO 6; PP. 727-736; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

SUMMARIZING MILITARY INFORMATION: AN APPLICATION OF SCHEMA THEORYGEISELMAN RE; SAMET MG.1980; HUM. FACTORS; ISSN 0018-7208; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 6; PP. 693-705; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

PERSONALIZED VERSUS FIXED FORMATS FOR COMPUTER-DISPLAYED INTELLIGENCE MESSAGESGEISELMAN RE; SAMET MG.1982; IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS; ISSN 0018-9472; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 490-495; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

A HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF GRAPHIC SYMBOL-DESIGN FEATURESSAMET MG; GEISELMAN RE; LANDEE BM et al.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 54; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1303-1310; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INFORMATION SEEKING WITH INPUT PACING AND MULTIPLE DECISION OPPORTUNITIESLEVINE JM; SAMET MG; BRAHLEK RE et al.1974; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 384-394; BIBL. 8REF.Article

INFORMATION SEEKING WITH LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND RESOURCES.LEVINE JM; SAMET MG; BRAHLEK R et al.1975; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 5; PP. 502-513; BIBL. 10 REF.Article